Taxing carbon across borders: Trade, pass-through, and green technology adoption
Abstract
|
Draft available upon request
Stringent climate policies in advanced economies increasingly condition market access on the carbon content of
production abroad. I study how such regulation affects foreign suppliers, exploiting the introduction of the EU’s Carbon
Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and tracing its impact on Indian exporters to the EU. I link a proprietary dataset
of firm-to-firm customs records to Indian administrative and capital-investment data on a firm level. Subsequently, I
classify investment projects using a novel, LLM-applied taxonomy of green, transitional, and vintage technologies for
23 polluting industries. Difference-in-differences estimates show that exposed firms expand their stock of green capital
projects by 18% and roughly double pollution-control spending. This is driven by sector-specific green upgrading,
substituting vintage, polluting technologies, rather than investing in renewables or carbon-capture equipment. The effect
is concentrated among larger firms and those starting from dirtier asset bases. As a result, exposed firms shift from on-
site fossil-based power generation to procuring electricity from the grid. The most exposed firms keep exporting to the
EU, while less exposed ones divert to other markets, offsetting only a fifth of the EU contraction. Border prices remain
unchanged, suggesting that the cost of the regulation is not passed back up the supply chain during the period of
study. A structural model of heterogeneous suppliers, differing in productivity and in access to clean energy, choosing
whether to enter the EU and whether to switch energy technology, delivers the same sorting and extends it to the charge
once fully in force. Nearly half of the fall in India’s EU-bound emissions is volume redirected to other markets, and it
reappears there almost one for one. India’s own emissions fall by 4 percent, two thirds of that from switching technology
and the rest from producing less. Green upgrading is plant-wide, therefore firms that clean up for the EU do so for sales
elsewhere, yielding a negative leakage overall, even though the diversion channel alone is positive. Across all exporting
origins the charge cuts emissions by 6 percent and global emissions by 2.4 percent, at a break-even carbon price of 30
dollars per tonne, while India bears the largest proportional welfare loss of any region.
International Growth Centre Research Grant
Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability Research Grant
Institute for Humane Studies Grant